[VoxBo] bad jobs for glm

Golbarg Tarighat Saber gts229 at nyu.edu
Mon Dec 21 12:45:16 EST 2009


 sorry, here are the attached files. 

thanks, 
Golbarg

----- Original Message -----
From: Golbarg Tarighat Saber <gts229 at nyu.edu>
Date: Monday, December 21, 2009 12:42 pm
Subject: Re: [VoxBo] bad jobs for glm
To: VoxBo Discussion List <voxbo-general at voxbo.org>

>   
> Hi, 
> 
> Thanks for your reply. For creating GLMs, I have been using 'glm' and 
> not 'vbmakeglm'. The last successful glm that I ran was about three 
> weeks ago. As for the path, I actually replaced my actual long path to 
> the analysis folder with the word 'path' to make my email more 
> concise. We have several versions of voxbo (including v1.8.5pre) in 
> the lab. I tend to choose the hrf filter for GLM  from the folder 
> voxbo- 1.8.5pre/elements. However, I'm not sure which version is 
> called when I type glm in the command line. "voxq -v" prints out the 
> voxbo version 'v1.8.4Jan 26 2007). You can attached .glm files 
> attached. 
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Daniel Kimberg <kimberg at mail.med.upenn.edu>
> Date: Sunday, December 20, 2009 12:59 pm
> Subject: Re: [VoxBo] bad jobs for glm
> To: VoxBo Discussion List <voxbo-general at voxbo.org>
> 
> > >  Executing script command: makematkg -m <path to the analysis folder>
> > ...
> > 
> > Normally you should see an actual path (and GLM stem) there, not 
> just 
> > the phrase "path to the analysis folder" in angle brackets.  I'm not 
> 
> > sure where that phrase came from, it doesn't seem to be in the 
> > codebase currently.  Are you using the 1.8.5pre version of the VoxBo 
> 
> > code?  How did you create the GLM, using "glm" or "vbmakeglm?"  In 
> > either case, it might help if you posted the contents of the .glm 
> > file, either the one you created or if you didn't make one, the one 
> 
> > that was created for you in the glm directory.
> > 
> > > The only files created in the analysis folder are *.G, *.glm, *.preG,
> > > *.ref, *.sub, averages.txt, and contrasts.txt. I first encountered
> > > this problem while running GLM on mfbrt*.tes files, and later I
> > > noticed that running GLM on sbrt*.tes files also fails due to similar
> > > bad jobs. I reran GLMs which I had run successfully before, but I
> > > couldn't replicate any of those. I'd be grateful if you can help me
> > > fix this problem.
> > 
> > If you're seeing the same problem with previously run analyses, it's 
> 
> > likely that something has changed in your configuration.  How long 
> ago 
> > were the old analyses run?
> > 
> > dan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 02visMGS_GLM_smoothedtest.glm
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1242 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.voxbo.org/pipermail/voxbo-general/attachments/20091221/6c50b9e8/attachment.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 02visMGS_delaysLR_Tseries_GLM.glm
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1258 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.voxbo.org/pipermail/voxbo-general/attachments/20091221/6c50b9e8/attachment-0001.obj 


More information about the voxbo-general mailing list